Quantcast

FREE books, live author chats and more when you create a free BookTrib membership account.

Recover password

What Are The Best Movies Based On Books?

Reprinted excerpt The Chicago Tribune by Nina Metz  05/08/13

Less than a year after “The Great Gatsby” was published in 1925, F. Scott Fitzgerald was paid $16,666 for the film rights. “Come and see it all!” beckons the trailer for the silent film. “And enjoy the entertainment thrill of your life!”

It is the only movie adaptation of “The Great Gatsby” — five in all, including the latest, from Baz Luhrmann — that was made at a time when bobbed hair was still the height of fashion.

No known copies of the original 1926 movie exist today. It’s probably just as well. Fitzgerald apparently hated it. An oft-cited letter from wife Zelda left little to the imagination: “We saw ‘The Great Gatsby’ in the movies. It’s ROTTEN and awful and terrible and we left.”

Doesn’t that sum up every disappointing experience watching a favorite book transmuted into something unrecognizable on screen? And yet, it can be thrilling when an adaptation really does capture something essential about an author’s work. Some movies are just better than their books.

With the latest version of “Gatsby” upon us, we polled some of today’s top authors — novelists and non-fiction writers alike — about Hollywood’s track record with book-to-movie adaptations.

To avoid putting anyone in a potentially awkward situation, we asked that each author talk about movies based on works other than their own.

Dennis Lehane
dennislehane.com

His novels include “Mystic River,” “Gone Baby Gone” and “Shutter Island,” each of which have been adapted into feature films.

Favorite: “‘Jaws’ and ‘The Godfather’ both achieve the near-impossible in that they’re better than the books they’re based on. ‘Jaws,’ in particular, is so much richer, the characters so much better drawn, and the tension so much more taut.

“The more a book is defined by the beauty of its language the harder it is to translate. ‘All the Pretty Horses’ is a perfect example. It’s actually a very good movie, but it can’t help but be a letdown because what was truly unforgettable in that book was not the tale but the teller. There’s a line in the book — ‘Between the wish and the thing, the world lies waiting’ — that on paper makes you go, ‘Whoa. Great line,’ but if you heard an actor say it you’d probably burst out laughing.”

Least favorite: “I can’t stand ‘Clockers,’ because the book is such a masterpiece and the film is so far off the mark. It’s the ham-handed work of an increasingly unsubtle filmmaker (Spike Lee) who had zero grasp of the tone and subject matter of the book he was adapting.”

Dennis Lehane

audreyniffenegger.com

The Chicago-based novelist and Columbia College writing instructor is the author of “The Time Traveler’s Wife,” which was made into a feature film.

Favorite: “My favorite adaptation ever is the BBC’s ‘Brideshead Revisited.’ I saw it before I had read the book. I think it managed to capture the subtle contradictions in the story, and the actors were all very perfect for their characters.

“I think badly written stories with lots of interesting plot are good candidates for adaptation, because in the process of becoming films the bad writing vanishes and the interesting story can be developed more artfully. Philip K. Dick’s writing is sometimes great but can also be awful, and the movies that have resulted have been very intriguing (my favorites are ‘Through a Scanner Darkly’ and ‘Blade Runner’).

Chuck Palahniuk
chuckpalahniuk.net

His novels “Fight Club” and “Choke” have been adapted into feature films. His latest novel, “Doomed,” (a sequel to “Damned,” about the adventures of a snarky prepubescent who literally goes to hell) comes out in October.

Favorite: “My favorite adaptation is so flawless that people forget it was a book: ‘Rosemary’s Baby.’ It’s endearing and kinetic. Roman Polanski only failed to use one small scene from the book. Originally, Rosemary Woodhouse flees to a mountain cabin, but loneliness overwhelms her and she returns to her husband. That’s exactly the type of scene that doesn’t translate well to film: a character alone in crisis, not speaking and doing no interesting task, and eventually reaching a decision. Polanski was smart to avoid it.”

Least favorite: “Don’t shoot the messenger, here. I strongly disliked the film of ‘Dune.’ The whispery voiceover ‘thoughts’ seem like a terrible device. The only redeeming quality of the film is how buff Sting looks.”

Judy Blume
judyblume.com

Winner of the 2013 Chicago Tribune Young Adult Literary Prize, which will be presented at the upcoming Printers Row Lit Fest in June, her books include “Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret,” “Deenie” and “Tiger Eyes,” the latter of which has been made into a film that opens in theaters June 7.

Favorite: “‘A Christmas Story,’ adapted by Jean Shepherd from his book, ‘In God We Trust: All Others Pay Cash,’ is wildly funny without a forced moment. Can anyone who’s ever seen it forget the frozen tongue? Would it have worked without Jean Shepherd’s narration? Probably not nearly as well. I watch the movie every few years, but I haven’t re-read the book in ages.

“‘To Kill a Mockingbird’ — when I think of the story now, I think of Gregory Peck, but that’s not a bad thing. I can’t imagine anyone better than Horton Foote adapting Harper Lee’s classic. Still, I’d go back to the book today before I’d watch the movie.

“A newer adaptation I really like is ‘The Perks of Being a Wallflower.’ In this case I prefer the movie to the book. Go figure …”

 

To read more CLICK HERE

Script Tips: Books That Drew Early Looks For The Big Screen

Reprinted excerpt Variety by 

More and more, studios trolling for the next “Hunger Games” are acquiring the rights to books before they’re published; a buzzworthy title sometimes gets snapped up before an author has even finished writing. (No, aspiring scribes, it still pays to actually complete your work.)

As one studio exec puts it, book-sales figures have never guaranteed dollars at the box office, so there’s room for some risk. Turns out numbers aren’t everything. “By buying rights early,” the exec says, “you are forced to look at the core idea instead of focusing on sales figures, which can be very misleading.”

Here are some titles that were all the rage before they hit the page:

“The Right Hand”
by Derek Haas
(Mulholland Books)

STUDIO: Universal acquired the rights with a low-seven-figure offer in October, and attached Scott Stuber to produce.
PLOT: The fourth in a series that follows a spy so covert the government doesn’t even acknowledge he exists. In this book, he is sent to track down a missing American operative who was captured in the Russian countryside.
HOT: The book drew a lot of attention after a trailer was released to promote it in October. Universal, of course, has had some success with spy pics.
FREE ADVICE: One of the biggest reasons the “Bourne” franchise has been so successful for the studio is not only because of the quality of talent involved, but also because it has made sure to distinguish itself stylistically from traditional spy thrillers. Universal could try to repeat that feat with a director in the mold of Daniel Espinosa, who helped guide another Universal/Stuber thriller, “Safe House,” to more than $100 million at the domestic box office.
PROSPECTS: Besides “Bourne” and James Bond, studios have had trouble delivering a solid spy movie. But Universal knows how to develop and market this type of movie.

“Brilliance”
by Marcus Sakey
(Thomas & Mercer/Amazon Books)

STUDIO: Legendary Pictures, in a competitive March auction that saw several suitors vie for the property, including Chernin Entertainment, won out with a low-seven-figure offer. Joe Roth (“Oz the Great and Powerful”) is attached to produce.

PLOT: The film is set in an alternate world, in which 1% of children are born savants, called “brilliants.” A federal agent who uses his skills to become a master hunter of terrorists pursues a savant terrorist who intends to provoke civil war.
HOT: The plot screams like something out of an “X-Men” comic, and you can be sure Legendary will market it in similar fashion.
FREE ADVICE: Legendary has gotten good at not only creating large ensembles but attracting top-tier talent to join those ensembles; just look at the Batman movies and the upcoming “Man of Steel.”
PROSPECTS: The comicbook genre couldn’t be any hotter, and given how “Brilliance” has the look and feel of one, it wouldn’t be a surprise if this becomes one of the company’s top priorities.

 

“Tin Men”
by Christopher Golden
(Random House)

STUDIO: Warner Bros. paid in the high-six figures to acquire the rights in January, and has Chernin Entertainment on board to produce.
PLOT: Unknown at this time, but given Golden’s previous works (“The Shadow Saga”), one can expect a supernatural feel to it.
HOT: Sometimes an author’s name will get studios champing at the bit, and Golden (“Talent,” “The Secret Journeys of Jack London”), whose speciality is YA horror fantasy, is one that draws that kind of attention. He’s already developing “Joe Golem and the Drowning City” with Alex Proyas.
FREE ADVICE: Given WB’s relationships with directors like Christopher Nolan and David Yates, who are capable of handling material like this, the bestcase scenario is to interest them in the project and then let them run with it.
PROSPECTS: All of Golden’s properties are still in development, and it’s unknown if his audience will carry over to theaters. That said, if there is one book genre that has seen its fanbase turn out in droves for movie adaptations, it’s YA, and Golden has a knack for it.

To read more  CLICK HERE

 

 

 

DOWNTON ABBEY Star Theo James Joins Shailene Woodley in Young Adult Adaptation DIVERGENT

Categories: Books-to-Movies, thriller Tags: , , , ,
By HulaMonkey on March 17, 2013

Excerpt reprinted The Daily Blam! by Pietro Filipponi

Summit Entertainment, a LIONSGATE® (NYSE: LGF) company, announced today that Theo James (Downton Abbey, UNDERWORLD: AWAKENING) will star as “Four” opposite Golden Globe nominated Shailene Woodley (THE DESCENDANTS, THE SPECTACULAR NOW) in the highly anticipated feature film production DIVERGENT.

The futuristic action adventure, based on author Veronica Roth’s New York Times best seller, will be directed by Neil Burger (LIMITLESS, THE ILLUSIONIST) from a script by Vanessa Taylor and commences principal photography this April in Chicago. The original draft of the script was written by Evan Daugherty. Doug Wick and Lucy Fisher are producing the project via their Red Wagon Entertainment banner (THE GREAT GATSBY) along with Pouya Shahbazian. Red Wagon’s Rachel Shane is executive producing. Summit will release the film theatrically in North America in THE HUNGER GAMES slot on Friday, March 21, 2014.

DIVERGENT is a thrilling adventure set in a future world where people are divided into distinct factions based on their personalities, Tris Prior (Woodley) is warned she is Divergent and will never fit into any one group. When she discovers a conspiracy to destroy all Divergents, she must find out what makes being Divergent so dangerous before it’s too late.

A man with a mysterious past, Four is Tris’s intense yet charismatic instructor and one of the leaders of the Dauntless faction.

In a joint statement, Rob Friedman and Patrick Wachsberger, Co-Chairmen of Lionsgate Motion Picture Group, said, “Theo is not only an incredibly talented actor, he is also who we envisioned as Four when reading Veronica’s novel which has taken the world by storm. As we continue to develop the film, the studio remains committed to providing fans with a movie adaptation that stays as true to the book as possible and we are confident that we have done so with our selection of Shailene and Theo in the leading roles.”

To read more CLICK HERE

Bookshelves To Box Office: A Look At The Best Picture Winners Over The Years

Categories: Books-to-Movies Tags:
By HulaMonkey on March 3, 2013

Reprinted The Hindu by Mini Anthikad Chhibber

Salman Rushdie spoke of the solitariness of a writer as opposed to the collaborativeness of film. The same holds true of the reader/viewer. As a reader it is just you and the words on the page creating magical worlds in your head, while as an audience, you are dipping into the collective imagination of the cast and crew in the communal setting of a theatre.

While enough has been said about how a movie can never replicate the feeling and emotions of a book — yeah Sir Larry was nowhere close to the Heathcliff in your head (Wuthering Heights), nor the Ents (Lord of the Rings) for that matter, there have been some movie adaptations that have worked absolutely brilliantly and swept the Oscars as well.

A look at the Best Picture winners over the years is a case in the point. Movies such as Gone With the Wind (1939), Rebecca the following year, From Here to Eternity (1953), Ben Hur (1959), The Godfather (1972), One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest (1975), The Silence of the Lambs (1991), Forrest Gump (1994) The English Patient (1996), The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003) and Slumdog Millionaire are all based on extraordinary books.

Among this year’s best picture nominees, Life of Pi, Les Miserables, Argo, Silver Linings Playbook and Lincoln are based on books.

And while there are books that scream “film me” from every page (remember The Da Vinci Code, the film like the book was sluggish as cement), there are others that have been deemed unfilmable. Topping the list could be Midnight’s Children. And while the jury is out on it — was Mehta too nervous of the iconic stature of the source material? There have been other films from equally unfilmable books that have been spectacular successes. The films have taken the source material and created a whole new and equally engaging animal with it.

Ang Lee’s Life of Pi, for instance, took Yann Martel’s book, magic realism and all and gave us a movie that was humourous, enchanting, engaging and engrossing. Michael Ondaatje’s Booker Prize winning tale of love beyond boundaries was lovingly translated on to screen by Anthony Minghella with The English Patient. The achingly-beautiful film went on to win nine Academy Awards including best supporting actress for Juliette Binoche.

Jonathan Demme’s The Silence of the Lambs which made slasher films respectable, gave a face to Hannibal the cannibal with Anthony Hopkins’ Oscar winning turn — fava beans would never be the same again. Incidentally the movie won the big five at the Oscars — film, director, actor, actress, adapted screenplay.

There are also best picture nominees based on books that did not work. Clint Eastwood’s adaptation of Dennis Lehane’s Mystic River (2003) is one of them. The film was nominated for six Oscars. Sean Penn and Tim Robbins won Oscars for Best Actor and Best Supporting Actor respectively but watching the film after reading the book, you get the feeling in the film that it is Penn acting as Jimmy feeling the pain of losing his child. In Lehane’s book you visit the dark spaces of the mind while though Robbins has given a consummate performance as the fragile Dave Boyle, you always have the feeling that you are watching a film. The film is distancing rather than engaging.

The Reader, (2008) also a best picture nominee, suffers because of its incandescent star power. Directed by Stephen Daldry (who helmed The Hours) based on the book by Bernard Schlink, the Holocaust film about love, lust, literacy and loneliness starred Ralph Fiennes and Kate Winslet. Though Winslet won the Best Actress Oscar for her portrayal of Hanna, the seductress and war criminal, she seemed to overwhelm the film, making it about her and not the generation growing up in the shadow of World War II.

Translating a book, and a well loved one at that, into film will always be a tricky affair. The films that succeed are those that go beyond the printed word and present a whole new reading on screen.

 

To read more CLICK HERE

New Book ‘The Searchers’ Exposes Roots Of A Legend

Reprinted Rapid City Journal Associated Press 02/24/13

A modest hit in theaters in 1956, “The Searchers” has grown in stature to become, for many, the greatest Western ever filmed and one of the most influential movies. Yet it’s always been more, thematically and culturally, than just a John Wayne movie about finding a white girl abducted by Comanche Indians.

Author Glenn Frankel’s “The Searchers: The Making of an American Legend” is a must-read for movie fans and anyone interested in mythmaking and the American West.

In 1836, Comanche Indians kidnapped 9-year-old Cynthia Ann Parker during a deadly raid on a white settlement in Texas. An uncle searched for her off and on for years. By the time Texas Rangers and others accidentally “rescued” her in 1860 during an attack on a Comanche camp, Cynthia Ann was a wife and mother. Her forced re-entry into white society — she was treated as if she were a pathetic oddity — was yet another tragic event in her life.

Using previously unpublished accounts and other archival material, Frankel notes that the facts surrounding her experience were twisted and molded, if not outright invented, to fit each storyteller’s purpose.

In Cynthia Ann’s day, she was a heroine to some for surviving her captivity, to others merely a white savage. A century later, she was cast as a proto-feminist, the original tough Texas woman.

“The truth was less triumphalist and more poignant,” Frankel writes. “Cynthia Ann was not the hardy survivor but rather the ultimate victim of the Texan-Comanche wars, abducted and traumatized by both sides.”

American culture wasn’t through with Cynthia Ann. Inspired to some degree by her saga, writer Alan LeMay focused his novel “The Searchers” not on the captive and her captors but on an uncle and adopted brother who try to find her. When LeMay sold the film rights, another mythmaker — director John Ford — went to work changing the story to fit his own vision as well as the needs of a director looking for a hit.

“The Searchers” was the ninth of the 14 major films in which Ford directed John Wayne. The actor owed his career to Ford — he plucked Wayne from B movie purgatory to star in “Stagecoach” (1939) when others wanted Gary Cooper — and Ford never let Wayne forget it.

Wayne took as much abuse as anyone from the bullying Ford. While making “The Searchers,” Ford screamed at Hollywood’s greatest cowboy, “When will you learn to ride a horse?”

To read more CLICK HERE

Fantasy Author Julie Kagawa Sells New Book Series to Universal

Categories: Books-to-Movies Tags: , , , ,
By HulaMonkey on February 9, 2013

Reprinted The Hollywood Reporter by Borys Kit 02/08/12

 

Universal has picked up an untitled young-adult book series proposal from fantasy author Julie Kagawa, with Chris Morgan attached to produce.

The supernatural story is set in a present-day coastal town where mythical creatures hide amongst us cloaked as humans. Slayers belonging to an order that dates back to St. George infiltrate the town disguised as out-of-town kids, setting up a confrontation and, as is the case with YA books, a love triangle.

The 104-page proposal was described as strong in execution. The deal went down late Thursday.

Harlequin TEEN– in a seven-figure, five-book deal — picked up book rights in January for its young-adult imprint. The first book is to be released in 2015.

Kagawa is a big name in the YA fantasy world. The Kentucky-based author is behind the fantasy series The Iron Fey, set in the realm of faeries, and Blood of Eden, a fairly new series centering on vampires set in a postapocalyptic future.

 

To read more CLICK HERE

“Bridget Jones” author Fielding to publish new novel

Reprinted Reuters 02/05/12

Helen Fielding

Helen Fielding, the British author of the bestselling “Bridget Jones’s Diary” books that were made into successful films has written a new novel that will be released in November, her U.S. publisher said on Tuesday.

In the still untitled book Fielding will continue to write in Bridget Jones’ voice but will follow her in a later stage of her life in present-day London.

“Few writers can rival Helen Fielding when it comes to fully capturing the modern woman,” said Sonny Mehta, the chairman and editor in chief of Alfred A. Knopf, which will publish the book.

“Bridget Jones’s Diary” came out in 1996, and was followed by a sequel, “Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason,” in 1999. The two novels sold more than 15 million copies, were published in 40 countries and adapted into films starring Renee Zellweger, Hugh Grant and Colin Firth.

“My life has moved on, and Bridget’s will move on, too,” Fielding said in a statement. “I hope people will have as much fun reading it, as I am writing it.”

The novel will also be published as an e-book and audiobook.

(Reporting by Noreen O’Donnel; editing by Patricia Reaney and Cynthia Osterman)

Ron Howard to Direct Graveyard Book Movie

Categories: Books-to-Movies Tags: , , ,
By HulaMonkey on January 24, 2013

Reprinted IGN.com by Jim Vejvoda

According to The Hollywood Reporter, the Oscar-winning Da Vinci Code filmmaker is in negotiations to direct the feature adaptation of Neil Gaiman‘s

The Graveyard Book was planned as an animated movie to be helmed by Selick, but the project fell apart last year. “In a new twist, Graveyard now has been reconfigured as a live-action movie,” claims the trade.

Gaiman’s young-adult novel about a boy raised by the otherworldly denizens of a graveyard earned critical acclaim and numerous honors, including the 2009 Hugo and Nebula awards.

About the Book: Nobody Owens is an unusual boy. He was raised in a graveyard by ghosts and has learned the secrets they keep, like the ability to fade and dream walk. And he’ll need all of those skills to face what is waiting for him on the outside.

This book trailer, narrated by Neil Gaiman with illustrations from the book by Dave McKean, will give you a taste of Gaiman’s new novel, The Graveyard Book, available in stores now.

 

The Graveyard Book.

Doris Kearns Goodwin On Her Bestselling Books

Categories: Books-to-Movies Tags: , ,
By HulaMonkey on January 1, 2013

By Erik Spanberg / January 1, 2013

Presidential historian Doris Kearns Goodwin long ago established herself as a writer with the most enviable of careers. Nothing can compare to Goodwin’s role as one of the most revered in a long line of biographers of America’s 16th president, Abraham Lincoln. Seven years ago, Goodwin published “Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln,” a highly successful work now back in the spotlight as the basis of Steven Spielberg’s new movie “Lincoln.” Goodwin talked with the Monitor’s Erik Spanberg about the movie, her role in the making of it, and her next book. Here are excerpts of their conversation.

Q: How does it feel to have “Team of Rivals” back in the headlines?

It’s been a wild ride…. I finished the book in 2005 and [Steven] Spielberg got the rights to it in 2000. And it just happened luckily to come out during this time of the lame-duck session [of Congress] so that it sends a connection. We never could have imagined [how timely it would be] so many years ago, when both of us took so long to make the book and the movie.

Q: How did your book catch Spielberg’s attention? 

Spielberg has always wanted to make a movie about Lincoln. It predated my book or my involvement. It’s been in his heart for a long time. I met [Spielberg], actually, in 1999…. And when he found out that I was doing a book on Lincoln – I was four years into the book at that time – he said, “Will you shake hands and I’ll get the first look at it when you’re done?” So, of course, I said yes. He decided [later] to acquire the rights, even though I was four years away from finishing.

To read the entire article CLICK HERE

reprint Christian Science Monitor

HBO acquired rights to THE LEFTOVERS for series development

 

Damon Lindelof’s first television series since Lost will be an drama adapted from Tom Perrotta’s novel The Leftovers. Deadline.com reported that HBO acquired rights to The Leftovers for series development last summer, “shortly before the book came out. Lindelof read the novel that fall and word is he immediately fell in love with it. He tracked the rights down to HBO, which is a network he, like many writers, had been looking to work at.” Lindelof and Perrotta will co-write the adaptation.

 

The Leftovers is, simply put, the best Twilight Zone episode you never saw.”–Stephen King, New York Times Book Review

 

 

Author Q&A  By Christopher Hartman / August 24, 2011 / Christian Science monitor

Was it the Rapture? Suddenly, on a seemingly ordinary October day, 87 people disappear from a small New England town in Tom Perrotta‘s new novel The Leftovers. Perrotta’s novel follows the stories of those left behind. End-time fiction may seem an unlikely genre for Perrotta (author of “The Abstinence Teacher,” “Little Children”). I asked him about this – and a few other things – in a recent interview.

Q. What inspired you to write about the Rapture in “The Leftovers?”

The original impulse came out of the research I did for “The Abstinence Teacher.” I got to thinking about the Rapture, and what it might be like for contemporary secular Americans if something like that really did happen. The more I thought about it, the more interested I became – the Rapture is both a lovely and troubling image, and a surprisingly rich metaphor for growing older and living with loss. We’re all aware of the empty spaces around us, the absences that remind us of the people who are no longer there.

The top 10 books of all time

Tom Perrotta

Wow – that’s the first time I’ve ever been compared to a mystical anything, not to mention a Greek philosopher. I don’t really distinguish between sympathy and honesty when I’m writing. The two go together – I’m interested in inhabiting my characters, seeing the world through their eyes. That said I do enjoy writing the more extreme characters, the ones who are so caught up in their personal dramas they can’t get any perspective on themselves – Tracy Flick in “Election,” Larry in “Little Children,” Tom Garvey in “The Leftovers.”

Q. Much of your writing revolves around temptations – and typically those that are succumbed to rather than avoided; for instance, Sarah Pierce and Brad Adamson‘s affair in “Little Children” and Jim McAllister and Linda Novotny‘s tryst in “Election” – which had radically different outcomes. How do you decide which characters will suffer and which ones will redeem themselves through remorse of some other catharsis?

Is it too glib (or theological) to say they all suffer and they’re all redeemed? In any case, those aren’t issues I’m particularly attuned to in the writing. I’m just trying to tell the story, to show how the characters got one place to the other, and what they learned on the way. As for writing about temptation, there’s no drama without temptation, and no novel without drama.

Q. Recalling for a moment the uproar author John Updike created in his home town of Ipswich, Mass., after writing “Couples,” a novel that was presumed by some to have revealed the intimate affairs of certain residents of that town, would you say that your fictional version of suburbia is more or less “exciting” than the reality?

I guess it depends on how exciting your life is. My novels are certainly more exciting than my own life. I would also say, in general, that the contemporary suburban world is probably a lot better behaved than the world Updike was writing about. There seems to be a lot less drama (fewer affairs, less divorce) than there was at the height of the sexual revolution. That’s probably good for society in general – whether it’s good for the novelist is another question.

Q. You’ve been called variously “the Steinbeck of Suburbia” and “an American Chekhov” for your insightful (and incisive) treatment of the lives of suburbanites. Were you at all influenced by other chroniclers of suburbia such as Updike, John Cheever, Dominick Dunne, or Philip Roth? Or, are there other writers of this particular subject matter who’ve left lasting impressions on you through their work?

Dominick Dunne is the odd man out on that list. Updike, Cheever, and Roth were big influences on my work, as they were for most writers of my generation, whether they want to admit it or not. I’m also heavily indebted to a number of writers I first encountered in the 1980s, when I was just beginning to write fiction – Raymond Carver, Ann Beattie, Richard Ford, Tim O’Brien, and of course, Tobias Wolff, whom I was lucky enough to study with in the Creative Writing Program at Syracuse.

Q. Have you considered your next project? If so, could you offer a thumbnail sketch?

I don’t know what my next fictional project will be. At the moment, I’m concentrating on the release of “The Leftovers,” working on a feature film script of “The Abstinence Teacher” (along with Lisa Cholodenko), and preparing to adapt “The Leftovers” for HBO.

Christopher Hartman is the author of “Advance Man: The Life and Times of Harry Hoagland.”

Older Posts »

59 queries in 0.577 seconds